home > archive > 2002 > this article

The Green Matrix

By Diane Alden
web posted February 25, 2002

In the sci-fi classic "The Matrix" there is a "green" world, the world inside the Matrix, and a "blue" world of dreamy illusion that feeds the Matrix.

The protagonist Neo, the seeker of truth and reality, must take a red pill or a blue pill to decide which future he will live in. The blue pill will let him stay in his dream world, while the red pill will bring him into the terrible reality of the green world of the Matrix.

The central problem facing humanity in the movie is delusion.

Morpheus and Neo in The Matrix
Morpheus and Neo in The Matrix

At one point in the film the rebel hero, Morpheus, tells the protagonist Neo that most people don't understand the illusory nature of the Matrix. Morpheus says: "The Matrix is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth. ... Unfortunately, no one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself."

What the hero finds in his reality is a ruling elite of artificial intelligence beings who tell the hero finally what they think of mankind:

"There is another organism on this planet that follows the same pattern [as humanity]: a virus. Human beings are a disease, a cancer of this planet. You are a plague, and we are the cure."

The citizens of the United States need to decide whether to take the red pill or the blue pill, because the "green cure" may not be to their liking.

As a matter of fact, the United States has been experiencing a "green" cure for some time. What is at stake in the course we choose is our freedom, our way of life and our humanity.

Dot Matrix - The Missing Lynx

Last month I began to investigate the case of the "missing Canadian lynx." What turned up was that the U.S. Forest Service and the Fish and Wildlife Service bureaucracy admitted that data had been manipulated and that a falsification of a "scientific" survey did take place.

Whether it is outright fraud or incompetence depends on who you talk to. It also depends on how you read the heavily censored Forest Service investigation into into its own wrongdoing.

The investigation came about after I read articles in the Washington Times and the Wall Street Journal that involved a retiring Forest Service employee who blew the whistle on what he thought was fraud in the handling of the "chain of evidence" in the lynx study.

It appears data on the lynx was manipulated by five U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Forest Service biologists and two Washington State Fish and Wildlife biologists.

But not even Congress can discover the names of the federal employees involved. The Forest Service and Fish and Wildlife people continue to stonewall the investigation, saying it is a matter of "protecting their privacy." Were they punished in any way? NO.

After receiving a packet from Washington State Senator Robert Morton, I discovered that the only names not redacted from the Forest Service report were the two Washington state biologists. It appears that they may be the fall guys or sacrificial lambs in this deal.

One source told me that one of the biologists MAY have connections to several environmental groups active in seeking to shut down human activity in the Wenatchee and Gifford Pinchot National Forests in Northeast Washington state.

It is much more difficult to ascertain the connection of the other biologist involved to any green group. In fact, my gut and the information in the report tell me his part in the survey may have been his own investigation into a previous fabrication and fraud of the lynx study under a Dr. John Weaver, hired by the Forest Service in 1999.

The earlier Weaver study showed that there were great numbers of Canadian lynx in an area that had never seen any, or very few if any, before. Later he had to confess that the chain of evidence had been contaminated and he withdrew the "study."

Sen. Robert Morton called for an investigation, which was held in January, on the recent case of falsification or manipulation of data by federal employees.

As I stated previously, the only testimony at the investigation came from ONE Forest Service supervisor (the federal Fish and Wildlife people never showed up), two Washington state Fish and Wildlife people and three representatives of activist environmental groups - groups whose goal is to SHUT THE FOREST DOWN.

The Senate committee seemed appeased, and the investigation went nowhere, completely frustrating Sen. Morton and other concerned legislators.

Does there seem to be a skewed investigation? It is mighty odd that the only testimony allowed came from members of the agencies involved in the scam and green advocates and agitators who want to close down the forest by declaring it a wilderness.

Does conflict of interest ring a bell? It did for Sen. Morton.

The Motive Behind the Fraud

Scientists tell me that the deceit involved in the Canadian lynx study is only one of many dots in the green matrix, as once again "science is put in service to a political agenda."

Trace the motive behind the fraud to an international agenda. An agenda adopted years ago when the U.N. and UNESCO were looking for ways to create a global economy and social structure - a collectivist utopian vision of the collective "good."

That ultimate "good" of course is decided by the world's elites, the "good" of the collective as opposed to the welfare and primacy of the individual. What would be created is a despotic utopian world where where our lives, property, economics, education, jobs and the environment are centrally planned.

The cover for the collectivist vision is the environment - and environmental policy. In order to use the environment to achieve a centrally planned global economy and culture, various groups and individuals took the necessary step of inventing the "science" of biocentrism and conservation biology.

To legitimize this unproven science, the Society of Conservation Biology was created by the IUCN (World Conservation Union) in 1985 and was initially funded by various foundations. The true goal of conservation biology was made clear when the journal Conservation Biology began publication in 1987. Michael Soulé, founder and then president of the Society of Conservation Biology, outlined the radical purpose of conservation biology.

Soulé stated, when the Society was founded, "We assume implicitly that environmental wounds inflicted by ignorant humans and destructive technologies can be treated by wiser humans and by wholesome technologies."

I wonder if Soulé is pals with Agent Smith from the Matrix?

In modern conservation theory, the notion of man as a cancer on the land is a recurring theme. So the new "science" helps explain away the harsh implementation of environmental regulations that may indeed destroy individuals and communities.

In the case of the Klamath farmers, for instance, or the destruction of an entire area by the bogus listing of a species of owl that was not endangered, we have "science" serving policy.

That science is called "biocentrism." It uses "conservation biology" and "ecosystem management" as tools to implement "managed" science. Like managed news, it is not about discovering the truth but rather about manipulating data to serve an agenda. In addition, the main screwdriver in the toolbox of "biocentrism" is the concept known as the "precautionary principle."

The new science that came into being through the IUCN now gives cover to all kinds of preconceived nostrums, notions and plans for the environment and for our lives.

Over the last 30 years the underpinnings of the environmental movement are the international goals of the centrally planned concept of "sustainable development," "smart growth" U.N. Agenda 21, the Wildlands Project, biosphere reserves ad infinitum to accomplish preconceived and political ends.

But in fact it is the environment that has proven to be the most successful tool collectivists have ever used in order to achieve their agenda, an agenda that is basically the same one that Hegel, Marx and Lenin wanted.

The people who rule the green matrix seek to centrally plan our lives. They have adopted the same philosophy as those who drove the peasants off the land in Russia. They are of the same mind as the Red Guard in China.

They are willing to sacrifice science, the truth and freedom, as well as the well-being of humans and the environment, in order to promote their utopian vision for the world - a vision that considers man a cancer on the land.

Strangely, the term "green matrix" comes up in many of their studies, claims and policy papers. But this isn't a movie. It is the new totalitarian vision.

Next: Part II of The Green Matrix: They Blinded Me With Science.

Diane Alden is a senior writer for Enter Stage Right and her web site can be found at www.aldenchronicles.com. Write to her at wulfric8@bellsouth.net

Printer friendly version
Printer friendly version
Send a link to this page!
Send a link to this story

Printer friendly version Send a link to this page!

Get weekly updates about new issues of ESR!






1996-2022, Enter Stage Right and/or its creators. All rights reserved.

You've seen the banner, now order the gear!
Visit ESR's anti-gun control gear web site for T-shirts, mugs and mousepads!