When
I was young, the local very conservative bookstore was called the Benjamin
Franklin Bookshoppe. The ideals espoused by the American revolutionary
in his Autobiography represent the best avowal of the American
values treasured by conservatives as clearly as ever achieved by any of
our statesmen cum men of letters. .But I wonder how much sympathy
Ben would have for modern conservativism, or modern liberalism, or, for
that matter, any tendency in modern American politics.
For one thing, there's his take on religion.
I esteemed the essentials ... in all the religions we had in
our country. I respected them all, tho' with different degrees of respect
as I found them more or less mixed with other articles without any tendency
to inspire, promote or confirm morality, [articles which] served principally
to divide us and make us unfriendly to one another.
Franklin abhorred rudeness, tendentiousness and self-promotion in public
discourse.
I grew very artful and expert in drawing people, even of superior
knowledge, into concessions the consequences of which they did not forsee,
entangling them in difficulties out of which they could not extricate
themselves, and so obtaining victories that neither myself nor my cause
always deserved. I continued this method some few years but gradually
left it, retaining only the habit of expressing myself in terms of modest
diffidence, never using when I advance anything which may possibly be
disputed the words, "certainly," "undoubtedly," or any others that give
the air of positiveness to an opinion; but rather say, "I conceive or
apprehend a thing to be so or so," "It appears to me," or "I should think
it so or so, for such and such reasons," ... And as the chief ends of
conversation are to inform, or to be informed, to please or to persuade,
I wish well-meaning and sensible men would not lessen their power of doing
good by a positive, assuming manner that seldom fails to disgust, tends
to create opposition, and to defeat every one of those purposes for which
speech was given to us.
Franklin, a lifelong journalist, had no taste for attack-dog partisan journalism.
Many of our printers make no scruple of gratifying the malice
of individuals by false accusations of the fairest characters among ourselves,
augmenting animosity even to the producing of duels, and are moreover
so indiscreet as to print scurrilous reflections on the government of
neighbouring states and even on the conduct of our best national allies
... These things I mention as a caution to young printers, that they may
be encouraged not to pollute their presses ... but refuse steadily, as
they may see by my example that such a course of conduct will not on the
whole be injurious to their interests.
Franklin, the most accomplished diplomat of the young republic, had no use
for grandstanding in public affairs.
The objections and reluctances I met with ... made me soon feel
the impropriety of presenting one's self as the proposer of any useful
project that might be supposed to raise one's reputation in the smallest
degree above that of one's neighbours when one has need of their assistance
to accomplish that project.
The most astonishing thing about American politics of our times is the venemous
tone of the discourse. Franklin knew how keep his perspective.
There are Natural Duties which precede political ones, and cannot
be extinguish'd by them.
It seems to me that if the twentieth century proved any political point,
it proved that purity of ideology is no guarantee of good government. One
only has to look at the dismal record of dictatorships to see the disaster
wrought in nations where compromise becomes impossible. In an era of increasingly
heated ideological wrangling it would perhaps do Americans of every persuasion
good to practice the conservatism of Franklin, a conservatism well-founded
in natural law and in the duty of civility and accomodation towards one's
fellow citizens.
Jack Woehr is lucky to have a wife clever enough to point out to him
all the occasions upon which he falls short of Franklin's exhortations.