home > archive > 2001 > this article

Bush encounters the energy crisis

By Nicholas Sanchez
web posted May 21, 2001

Let's see here. For the past few months, Californians have been lugging flashlights along with their briefcases and lunches to work because of rolling blackouts. People all over the country - this writer especially -- have felt an extra pinch paying their bill at the gas station. And New Yorkers are bracing themselves for conditions similar to their counterparts in the Golden State.

Considering the Bush Administration has been up and running for less than five months now, you might think that liberal politicians would take an honest look at the policies of previous administrations and then opt for a different course. Of course, that makes far too much sense.

President Bush looks skyward before his energy speech at the Safe Harbor Hydroelectric Power Plant on May 18 in Conestoga, Pa.
President Bush looks skyward before his energy speech at the Safe Harbor Hydroelectric Power Plant on May 18 in Conestoga, Pa.

Meanwhile, President George W. Bush and his advisers (led by Vice President Dick Cheney) have looked at the Clinton Administration's handling of energy policy, which was heavy on the conservation side and light on the supply side. The grown-ups now running the government realize that there is a very real crisis in progress with regard to U.S. energy policy. In response to this crisis, the Bush Administration has submitted a proposal that will not produce any short-term miracles, but should provide long-term solutions. Naturally, this has caused the Democrats and their environmentalist friends to go nuts.

All last week we heard Democratic (and a few Republican) Congressmen and their grassroots cohorts protesting pretty much along these lines: Bush's plan is a sham. It only takes into account corporate interests. The environment is going to suffer as never before in the whole history of mankind. Dick Cheney is a corporate stooge. Putting the hysterical clucking of the Left aside for a moment, it might be beneficial to look at what Bush et al. are actually trying to do.

First of all, the Administration has not kicked conservation to the side. Vice President Cheney has been quite candid on this matter and said that their new policies will not be consumption-driven. Nevertheless, the White House will continue to push some for the development of "fuel-efficient" vehicles and other energy efficient programs. Of course, whenever the Executive Branch offers any such "encouragement", they ultimately end up costing consumers more. You would think that this would thrill folks on the left.

What really has the other side bouncing off the walls is Bush's plan to diversify our energy supplies. The harsh reality there is an energy shortage in the U.S. The reason there is a shortage is because there is a great demand for it. We all enjoy ducking into our offices to cool off on hot summer days. Weekends provide a great opportunity for jumping into our cars, cranking the air-conditioning, and going on a "road trip." And despite all of the failed nostrums of the previous Democratic Administration, Americans are consuming more and more energy -- at an increased rate of about 1.7 per cent annually for the past twenty years, as was recently reported by the Wall Street Journal.

The President is aware of this reality and is working to enact policies that will stop the energy shortages by making the United States less dependent on foreign oil. Anyone who thinks that the situation in the Middle East is any more stable than it was at the time of the Gulf War should seriously consider getting their head examined. With all of the new technologies developing, there is no reason that we cannot start exploring environmentally clean ways to get energy here on our own lands.

In any case, we should all appreciate the initiatives the Bush Administration is putting forth. We should appreciate the fact that Bush's people realize that if we were to continue the path of an energy policy that was based solely on conservation, we would all be sitting at home in the dark in a few months. After all, of all 50 states in the U.S., guess which one has some of the most strident conservation policies and ranks 47th nationally in energy consumption? Give up? The answer is California.

Nicholas Sanchez is the Free Congress Foundation's Director of Development.

Other related articles: (open in a new window)

  • Kalifornia's Fascists By Alan Caruba (web posted May 21, 2001)
    Alan Caruba blasts a "suggestion" that California seize privately owned power plants and praises the Bush energy plan
  • Thirty years of California's opposition to energy by Alan Caruba (April 9, 2001)
    It only took three decades for Californians to realize that a modern society needs electricity, writes Alan Caruba
  • Getting the policy right by Henry Lamb (April 9, 2001)
    Henry Lamb says the energy crisis is finally forcing Americans to choose what side of the philosophical divide they stand on
  • California and Kyoto by Alan Caruba (January 22, 2001)
    What do the power shortages and the Kyoto Climate Control Treaty have in common? Alan Caruba says everything

Current Issue

Archive Main | 2001

E-mail ESR




1996-2021, Enter Stage Right and/or its creators. All rights reserved.