[Previous entry: "Senate passes 'partial birth' abortion ban"] [Main Index] [Next entry: "KMG"]

10/21/2003 Archived Entry: "Mommie Dearest"

HITCHENS ON MOTHER THERESA: It's no secret that Christopher Hitchens really disliked Mother Theresa so it should be no surprise that he's written yet another anti-MT essay. I'm neutral on the issue because I'm not a Catholic but Hitchens does raise some proper points:

It used to be that a person could not even be nominated for "beatification," the first step to "sainthood," until five years after his or her death. This was to guard against local or popular enthusiasm in the promotion of dubious characters. The pope nominated MT a year after her death in 1997. It also used to be that an apparatus of inquiry was set in train, including the scrutiny of an advocatus diaboli or "devil's advocate," to test any extraordinary claims. The pope has abolished this office and has created more instant saints than all his predecessors combined as far back as the 16th century.

As for the "miracle" that had to be attested, what can one say? Surely any respectable Catholic cringes with shame at the obviousness of the fakery. A Bengali woman named Monica Besra claims that a beam of light emerged from a picture of MT, which she happened to have in her home, and relieved her of a cancerous tumor. Her physician, Dr. Ranjan Mustafi, says that she didn't have a cancerous tumor in the first place and that the tubercular cyst she did have was cured by a course of prescription medicine. Was he interviewed by the Vatican's investigators? No. (As it happens, I myself was interviewed by them but only in the most perfunctory way. The procedure still does demand a show of consultation with doubters, and a show of consultation was what, in this case, it got.)

This beatification does strike me as a personal crusade by Pope John Paul II but then again, he's the one with the big hat, not me.

Read on.